For many business owners, "TDS" is a
singular term, but in the Indian regulatory landscape, it refers to two
distinct obligations under different statutes: the Income-tax Act and
the CGST Act. Confusing these can lead to significant compliance errors
and interest liabilities. While both mechanisms involve withholding a portion
of a payment for the government, they operate under distinct legal frameworks,
serve different objectives, and carry unique accounting implications.
As we navigate the transition to the Income-tax
Act, 2025, understanding these differences is critical for professional
compliance.
1.
FUNDAMENTAL OBJECTIVES
Income Tax TDS: This is a "pay-as-you-earn" mechanism designed to collect tax
on income at the point of origin. It ensures a steady flow of revenue to the
government and serves as a tool to track the total income of the payee.
GST TDS:
Governed by Section 51 of the CGST Act, this serves primarily as a compliance
and tracking tool for the supply chain, particularly for high-value contracts
involving government entities. (Note: Detailed GST TDS provisions are outside
the scope of the Income Tax provided, but practitioners often compare them to
IT-TDS during audits).
2.
GOVERNING STATUTES AND RECENT CHANGES
Income Tax: Currently, we are in a dual-track period where the Income-tax
Act, 1961 governs liabilities for periods up to March 31, 2026, while
the Income-tax Act, 2025 applies to transactions on or after April
1, 2026. Under the 2025 Act, TDS provisions have been consolidated into
simplified tabular formats under Sections 392 and 393.
GST: Remains governed by the CGST Act, 2017.
3.
APPLICABILITY AND THRESHOLDS
Income Tax: IT-TDS applies broadly to most taxpayers (including individuals
and HUFs exceeding certain turnover limits) making payments for salaries,
rent, professional fees, or to contractors. Thresholds vary; for instance,
payments to contractors generally trigger TDS if a single sum exceeds
₹30,000 or the aggregate exceeds ₹1,00,000.
GST: GST-TDS is more restricted, generally applying only to Government
departments, local authorities, or notified agencies when the total value
of supply under a contract exceeds ₹2.5 lakhs.
4.
TRIGGER FOR DEDUCTION
Income Tax: The obligation to deduct tax arises at the earlier of two
events: the credit of the sum to the account of the payee OR the
actual payment in cash, cheque, or any other mode.
GST: Deduction is strictly triggered at the time of payment to
the supplier.
5.
ACCOUNTING AND DEDUCTIBILITY (SECTION 43B)
One of the most critical legal
distinctions involves the "allowability" of these taxes as business
expenses:
Income Tax TDS: Under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, any sum payable as
Income-tax is explicitly excluded from being allowed as a
business deduction. This means the TDS itself is not an expense but a
payment of the tax liability of the payee.
GST (including GST TDS): Any tax, duty, cess, or fee (such as GST, sales
tax, or excise) is allowed as a deduction in the year it is
actually paid to the Government. For income tax purposes, if GST was
debited to the Profit & Loss account and paid before the ITR filing
due date, it is an eligible deduction.
6.
TAX AUDIT REPORTING (FORM 3CD)
Tax auditors must
distinguish between these two in the audit report:
Clause 34: Requires detailed reporting on whether the assessee has complied
with IT-TDS provisions, including section-wise details of amounts
deducted and deposited.
Clause 44: Requires a breakup of the total expenditure of the entity,
specifically identifying spending relating to entities registered or not
registered under GST. This is used to reconcile expenditure with
GST compliance.
7. CONSEQUENCES OF DEFAULT
Income Tax: Failure to deduct or deposit attracts interest at 1% to 1.5%
per month. The deductor may be deemed an "assessee-in-default,"
leading to recovery actions and potential penalties.
GST: Similar interest and penalty provisions apply; however, the credit
of GST TDS is claimed by the supplier in their Electronic Cash Ledger to
discharge their GST liability.
SUMMARY TABLE
|
Feature
|
TDS under
Income Tax (ITA 2025)
|
TDS under
GST (CGST 2017)
|
|
Section
|
Sections
392 and 393
|
Section 51
(CGST Act)
|
|
Trigger
|
Earlier of
Credit or Payment
|
At the time
of Payment
|
|
Threshold
|
Varies
(e.g., ₹30k/₹1L for contractors)
|
Contract
value > ₹2.5 Lakhs
|
|
43B Status
|
Non-deductible (Income
Tax)
|
Deductible on payment
basis
|
|
Audit Form
|
Reported
under Clause 34
|
Impacts Clause
44
|
Practitioner’s Note: Ensure clients understand that paying GST-TDS
does not fulfill their IT-TDS obligations. Furthermore, during the transition
to the 2025 Act, IT-TDS must reference the new section numbers (e.g., quoting
Section 393 instead of 194C) to avoid system validation errors.